Home Career Using Body Cameras for Intelligence Operations
Using Body Cameras for Intelligence Operations

Using Body Cameras for Intelligence Operations

2

By Lisa Kochevar, Faculty Member, Intelligence Studies at American Military University

Body cameras are often discussed for use by local police officers; in addition, they are extremely important tools for intelligence officers and interrogators. The ability to covertly record and later review interactions with sources often leads to a more detailed picture of the intelligence captured during an interaction. Recordings of faces, voices, and identifying characteristics may prove valuable not only at the tactical level, but for overall national security.

During an interrogation, intelligence officers aim to gather information as broad as the intentions of a group and as detailed as the roles of certain individuals within that group. But intelligence goes far beyond what is communicated verbally. Important information can be communicated non verbally, though it can be difficult for an interrogator to interpret in the moment. Being able to review the interaction afterwards can often lead to a better understanding of the source and the situation.

[Related Article: Sisters of Battle: Analyzing Female Terrorists]

For example, body language and demeanor provide information beyond the words spoken aloud. In the moment, the interrogator must try to evaluate the forcefulness, threat, and attitude of the source. Such behavior can be exhibited through small tics, shifting of the body and vocal changes, which may be interpreted as deception. However, these small changes in attitude and behavior can be easily missed; cameras provide the opportunity for later review and analysis to collect this additional information.

 

Using body cameras for intelligence gathering is relatively inexpensive. Cameras can cost from $100 to several thousand dollars and are easy to maintain and operate. The more expensive models come with additional features such as three-dimensional recordings, high-definition filming, and effective operation in low-light scenarios.

Moreover, using body cameras for intelligence collection is practical because the cameras are relatively small and lightweight. They can be mounted on specialized glasses or pinned to the front of clothing so they are inconspicuous, which helps ensure that sources are not aware they are being recorded.

Unlike domestic recording by intelligence officers, using body cameras for intelligence collecting in foreign zones does not introduce privacy issues. However, body cameras should be used within the boundaries of legal interrogation as outlined in Field Manuals 34-52 and 2-22-3 published by the U.S. Department of the Army. Interrogations must fall within the legal limits of the United States Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and the Geneva Conventions.

Using body cameras ensures that interrogators reap as much information from an encounter as possible and provides the ability for others in the intelligence community to assess the information and verify its source.

Lisa KochevarAbout the Author: Lisa Kochevar is currently a full-time faculty member with American Military University, School of Global Security. Lisa earned her M.A. from California State University at San Bernardino in National Security Studies and has worked in higher education since 1999. Lisa has worked with such agencies as the Department of the Army, JSOC, and Special Forces Units. Lisa currently lives in Denver, Colorado with her two sons.

 

Comments

Comment(2)

  1. A caveat for such matters is the security of the recordings themselves. The danger of unintended disclosure can lead to putting both sides of the intelligence relationship in physical danger. Additionally, counterintelligence uses of compromised recordings can wreak havoc on intelligence gathering, especially if the recordings are unknowingly hacked or passed by a mole.

    Before we start recording intelligence interactions, I believe we need to address internal security of such recordings first. We have seen leaders in the IC unable to keep their email accounts safe, using commercial servers of all places. Since cyber security apparently escapes certain IC leaders, it hardly seems we have a secure enough environment for adding recordings to the fold that carries such risks.

  2. TX law states video recordings are inadmissible in court as evidence however the recorded individual can evoke their constitutional right by plainly stating they are not giving their consent to be recorded. Simply informing the other they are being recorded usually deters mischievous behaviors.

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *